|
61)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 371)
Posted 21 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: New record! one thing for sure - creditnew just not managed to rip of your humour. ;) but seriously - i do not think this can go on. about time eric get's rid of it before all the happy campers have made their decisions.. |
|
62)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 369)
Posted 21 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: 55 credits for 36 hours. Oh how we laughed. looks like you managed to draw a blank in credit-lotto.. :( |
|
63)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 363)
Posted 20 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: Looks like almost all the tasks isued since the switch to v2.03 have been of the "under 30 minutes - outlier" variety. According to the application details for host 1289, she's completed 53 tasks so far but not a single one of them has run long enough to count towards re-establiching an APR. exactly the same over here - except a single one which ran for 17256 seconds and got 104 credits. :( does not look like a working solution.. |
|
64)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 361)
Posted 20 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: it's about time to get rid of creditnew! an old single core sempron getting ~500 credits per hour while current I7's get 20 per core. this is way too crazy.. |
|
65)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 360)
Posted 20 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: I think what happened was V2.03 of the application :) yup - credit-lotto starts from scratch.. |
|
66)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 350)
Posted 19 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: that did not help - my PHENOMII running @ 3.3 GHz shows up on the project with Average processing rate 35481.973041909 - OMFG.. |
|
67)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 347)
Posted 18 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: thanks for showing up richard! your charts look pretty similar to what i remember from AQUA. it was quite freaky at first, looked like it had setteld and then - you know the story.. |
|
68)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Unexpected warning...
(Message 316)
Posted 3 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: that's exactly what usually happens if willy updates a project in BAM! |
|
69)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Had to abort some WUs
(Message 313)
Posted 2 Nov 2011 by frankhagen Post: it's probably not a bright idea to run ancient P4's on a project where you might hit heavy stuff like that.. |
|
70)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Maximum Elapsed Time Exceeded (Win 32bit)
(Message 284)
Posted 28 Oct 2011 by frankhagen Post: thank you richard! but it's much worse: i got an Q9450 which is currently showing an average processing rate of 722022 and of course runtime prediction is over 2.000 hours right now. :( |
|
71)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Maximum Elapsed Time Exceeded (Win 32bit)
(Message 278)
Posted 27 Oct 2011 by frankhagen Post: There must be another way to control this, as the fpops est/bound doesn't seem to be helping. if there is any way to seperate ultra-short from extra-long WU's... set up two seperate sub-projects for opt in. BOINC in no way can cope with what you are sending out now! |
|
72)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Maximum Elapsed Time Exceeded (Win 32bit)
(Message 276)
Posted 27 Oct 2011 by frankhagen Post: What is your DCF for NumberFields? I bet it's close to 40. Mine is 3.2 on one computer, 31 on the other. it was around 12 before i decided to reset the project - then estimated runtime was around 500h. then i got a bunch of very short WU's and the crazyness turned the other way around.. mixing WU's with 2 seconds and up to way more than 10.000 must drive the clients crazy - no matter what eric does to estimated flops. |
|
73)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Maximum Elapsed Time Exceeded (Win 32bit)
(Message 273)
Posted 27 Oct 2011 by frankhagen Post: now it's going totally berserk! predicted runtime has jumped to 5.200 HOURS :( |
|
74)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
error -177
(Message 270)
Posted 26 Oct 2011 by frankhagen Post: check there: http://stat.la.asu.edu/NumberFields/forum_thread.php?id=35 |
|
75)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 212)
Posted 20 Sep 2011 by frankhagen Post: Unfortunately I have not gotten any work units that run for 36 minutes and pay me 50 points, which is a pity. BRIGHT IDEA! now we know who (and maybe some other fraggles) is responsible for that huge foulup. thank you very much. :( |
|
76)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Massive drop of credits per CPU hour
(Message 173)
Posted 7 Sep 2011 by frankhagen Post: crazycredits at its best: 53436 35396 7 Sep 2011 11:39:55 UTC 7 Sep 2011 13:08:25 UTC Completed and validated 5,242.71 5,127.42 120.96 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v1.06 53429 35389 7 Sep 2011 11:41:14 UTC 7 Sep 2011 13:00:45 UTC Completed and validated 4,425.94 4,301.67 135.36 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v1.06 53420 35380 7 Sep 2011 11:39:55 UTC 7 Sep 2011 12:32:37 UTC Completed and validated 3,089.19 3,038.72 124.95 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v1.06 53398 35358 7 Sep 2011 11:46:46 UTC 7 Sep 2011 13:37:27 UTC Completed and validated 2,869.65 2,722.25 52.74 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v1.06 |