1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Talk about your long ones
(Message 1285)
Posted 1 Jun 2015 by Grandpa Post: 10830548 9890344 24 May 2015, 20:27:34 UTC 1 Jun 2015, 1:43:45 UTC Completed and validated 595,565.21 595,057.10 9,504.58 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v3.02 I just completed the one listed above looks like it took 6.9 days to run it on a 3500Mhz machine. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Looks like you may need to fix a coupple bad WU's
(Message 1277)
Posted 23 May 2015 by Grandpa Post: Good to know I will keep an eye out for these when I am running the project, the odds are pretty good that if there are any out there I will get them, since I run so many work units daily when running the project and rarely get errors. Perhaps I can be of some help in keeping the loss of cpu cycles down. I went back and looked a little further in my history and I think the one listed below may be another one. wu_sf3_DS-10x271_Grp464214of682667 http://numberfields.asu.edu/NumberFields/workunit.php?wuid=9843193 |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Looks like you may need to fix a coupple bad WU's
(Message 1275)
Posted 22 May 2015 by Grandpa Post: I noticed a couple of WU's had erred out when checking my work stats they have erred on several other machines besides my own so I am guessing they may be broken. wu_sf3_DS-10x271_Grp518833of682667 http://numberfields.asu.edu/NumberFields/workunit.php?wuid=9955823 wu_sf3_DS-10x271_Grp491521of682667 http://numberfields.asu.edu/NumberFields/workunit.php?wuid=9902500 |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Talk about your long ones
(Message 1271)
Posted 3 May 2015 by Grandpa Post: 10675756 9875276 30 Apr 2015, 14:17:14 UTC 3 May 2015, 19:14:48 UTC Completed and validated 276,695.77 276,228.60 7,307.92 Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant v3.02 I do believe this is the longest running one I have ever had that completed and got credit for, what is the longest one ever run that completed and got credit |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1107)
Posted 30 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: Well I posted over at the boinc forums so we will see if they can shed any light on the subject. I believe so since they are apparently using FLOPS as there benchmark basis and Intel will out produce AMD by quite a bit when it comes to FLOPS. |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1105)
Posted 22 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: Well I posted over at the boinc forums so we will see if they can shed any light on the subject. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=9569#55514 |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1104)
Posted 22 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: I just recalled where I saw the benchmark results. They are in the server database in the host table. I just looked at yours and here is what I found: Yeah I noticed that Boinc credit system is messed up when it comes to AMD processors and some projects. Maybe all projects |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1102)
Posted 22 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: I just recalled where I saw the benchmark results. They are in the server database in the host table. I just looked at yours and here is what I found: Yeah I will give it a try (EDIT) I have now re benchmarked them so we shall see |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1100)
Posted 22 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: You bring up a very good point. Based on the number of results returned, your AMD is clearly faster. So why does it receive less credit per WU? LOL Boinc points system is predigest against AMD, here is some very good proof of that all of these rigs were started at relatively the same time by BAM. As you can see the even the 6276's clock for clock are faster than Intel at Numberfields and the 63xx ES chips 48 core are much faster but yet both the AMD rigs make significantly less PPD than the Intels and they are doing as much or more work per day. My machines stats are not hidden and are available for all to see here you can clearly see that the 63xx rig has the fastest completion time per WU of all the rigs and the 6276 rig is pretty much = to all the Intel’s yet it gets around 30% less credit than the Intel’s. I think Boinc needs to go back to the drawing board with their credit system. Grandma AMD 6276 @ 3042 / 64 core All tasks for computer 19134 State: All (1431) · In progress (64) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1367) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1431) · Get Decic Fields (1411) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (20) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19134 81030 79662 79588 Grandpa AMD 63xx @ 3813 / 48 core All tasks for computer 19787 State: All (1696) · In progress (84) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1612) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1696) · Get Decic Fields (1676) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (20) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19787 75189 75350 73633 Musky Intel 4650 @ 3134 /64 core All tasks for computer 19181 State: All (1429) · In progress (64) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1363) · Invalid (0) · Error (2) Application: All (1429) · Get Decic Fields (1407) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (22) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19181 115422 112214 105445 Patriot Intel 4650 @ 3134 64 core All tasks for computer 19133 State: All (1407) · In progress (64) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1343) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1407) · Get Decic Fields (1387) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (20) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19133 110536 109153 110064 Scotty Intel 4650 @ 3175 / 64 core All tasks for computer 19127 State: All (1583) · In progress (88) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1431) · Invalid (0) · Error (64) Application: All (1583) · Get Decic Fields (1564) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (19) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19127 113613 128981 124152 Core32 Intel 4650L @ 3100 / 64 core All tasks for computer 19220 State: All (1436) · In progress (87) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1349) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1436) · Get Decic Fields (1411) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (25) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19220 107368 108940 109216 Tear Intel 4650 @ 3134 / 64 core All tasks for computer 19121 State: All (1491) · In progress (143) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (1348) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1491) · Get Decic Fields (1476) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (15) ID Today Yesterday 2 Days Ago 19121 117970 111557 106929 http://numberfields.asu.edu/NumberFields/hosts_user.php?userid=19345 |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD vs Intel
(Message 1097)
Posted 21 Aug 2014 by Grandpa Post: I was just curious as to why a WU that is run on an Intel CPU that is slower gets more credit than A WU that is run on a faster AMD that uses the same amount of CPU time. Is the AMD given smaller WU's by default or something along that line. This WU was run on an Opteron 63xx CPU @ 3.8Ghz and received 333.98 points 8271791 7647561 20 Aug 2014, 19:20:43 UTC 21 Aug 2014, 2:58:06 UTC Completed and validated 18,512.48 18,290.26 333.98 Get Decic Fields v1.02 This was run on an Intel 4650L @ 3.1Ghz it took slightly less time and received more credit 8271417 7647187 20 Aug 2014, 15:30:02 UTC 20 Aug 2014, 22:45:45 UTC Completed and validated 18,474.27 18,441.73 365.63 Get Decic Fields v1.02 This was ran on the same Intel machine and took slightly more time and received more credit 8272432 7648202 20 Aug 2014, 19:17:33 UTC 21 Aug 2014, 3:32:04 UTC Completed and validated 18,764.50 18,717.99 371.37 Get Decic Fields v1.02 Now some will say the Intel is actually faster than the AMD but I do not think that is correct. Both of these machines were started on the project ar the same time and the AMD has completed more WU's In the same amount of time and the AMD only has 48 cores vs the Intel having 64 cores. 63xx @ 3813 / 48 core State: All (1018) · In progress (82) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (936) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (1018) · Get Decic Fields (1005) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (13) 4650L @ 3100 / 64 core State: All (873) · In progress (100) · Validation pending (0) · Validation inconclusive (0) · Valid (773) · Invalid (0) · Error (0) Application: All (873) · Get Decic Fields (858) · Get Decics with Bounded Discriminant (15)[/code] |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
WU's starting out at just below 50%
(Message 1079)
Posted 19 Jul 2014 by Grandpa Post: It looks like you may have got this problem fixed. I noticed today that they were starting at 1% and appear to be progressing normally to 100% Thanks for fixing it or at least attempting to. |